GoPro Kopen

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Camera test
  • Camera check
  • Camera settings
  • Camera recording

GoPro Kopen

Header Banner

GoPro Kopen

  • Home
  • Camera test
  • Camera check
  • Camera settings
  • Camera recording
Camera recording
Home›Camera recording›Experts say traffic camera bills on Pritzker’s desk are ripe for abuse – Muddy River News

Experts say traffic camera bills on Pritzker’s desk are ripe for abuse – Muddy River News

By Roberto L. Sanner
May 1, 2022
0
0

Governor JB Pritzker | Photo courtesy of Illinois Politics

Two bills on Governor JB Pritzker’s desk could to expand Illinois highway camera surveillance program to cover an additional 6,600 miles of road in 22 counties as the General Assembly seeks to crack down on highway crime ahead of the November election.

House Bill 260 and House Bill 448 – adopted alongside 80 other proposals in the last dayof the legislative session – would see the governor expand a Cook County license plate monitoring pilot program to the rest of Illinois with $20 million in new funding.

The measure would add hundreds of new cameras while increasing the number of crimes the cameras can be used to investigate and the number of parties that can prosecute them.

While lawmakers argue the bills could help investigate and prosecute crimes on state highways, Illinois State Police note that they have not been able to quantify the number of crimes solved by cameras during Cook County. pilot program.

Civil liberty groups opposed to the devices said there was a lack of transparency that leaves the program ripe for abuse. There is no information on how the cameras are placed, drivers are prohibited from reviewing footage when charged with offenses and law enforcement is required to delete the video 120 days after the incident. recording, which essentially destroys the evidence.

ISP spokesperson Melaney Arnold said the agency would not finalize and share camera locations until after the bill is signed into law. The new legislation excludes in particular explicit indications on the roads which would benefit from the additional surveillance.

“Who decides on the location of the cameras? asked State Senator Jason Barickman, R-Bloomington. “Are the cameras placed in areas more frequented by more minorities and does that give a discriminatory effect to the fact that we are targeting certain populations?”

“While these tools may bring some benefit to the public, the risk is that they are susceptible to abuse and have a chilling effect on public life.”

The measures change the Highway Camera Act of 2020, which placed about 100 license plate reading cameras on the Dan Ryan Freeway in Chicago with a $12.5 million IDOT grant. The program was launched in response to an increase in highway shootings during the pandemic.

The ISP has reported 72 freeway shootings in Cook County so far in 2022.

HB 4481 would extend the program to highways and national highways in the counties of Boone, Bureau, Champaign, DeKalb, DuPage, Grundy, Henry, Kane, Kendall, Lake, LaSalle, Macon, Madison, McHenry, Morgan, Peoria, Rock Island, Sangamon, St Clair, Will and Winnebago.

State Rep. LaToya Greenwood, an East St. Louis Democrat who sponsored the bill, said camera locations will be chosen based on traffic data. The counties were chosen following discussions with law enforcement and lawmakers who saw the need for additional crime-solving tools.

If signed, HB 260 would allow police to use camera footage to also investigate hijackings and forcible crimes such as murder, felony sexual assault, robbery, burglary, arson, kidnapping and aggravated bodily harm.

The bill would also give the attorney general’s office, as well as local state attorneys, the power to prosecute felony, firearms trafficking and firearms offenses on highways patrolled by camera.

Yet lawmakers have expressed concern over the ban on citizens viewing videos of alleged violations before evidence is suppressed, which creates wide scope for abuse and discrimination by law enforcement authorities. ‘State.

“The ISP basically determines where the cameras go. He gets the video and doesn’t release it, and he doesn’t have to provide a justifiable reason,” said state Rep. Curtis Tarver, a Democrat from Chicago. “And at the same time, the Attorney General can potentially prosecute suspected criminals, but we also write into law that we will remove the very video against which the Attorney General may have to defend these officers. It’s crazy.”

close

Categories

  • Camera check
  • Camera recording
  • Camera settings
  • Camera test

Recent Posts

  • Photography cheat sheet: what are circles of confusion?
  • Xiaomi launches 12S series with Leica camera – Here’s what you need to know
  • Thanet Photo Club showcases its work in Ramsgate exhibition
  • Xaimo’s 12S Ultra packs a massive 1-inch camera sensor with Leica optics
  • Huawei introduces XMAGE camera imaging brand after Leica split

Archives

  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • October 2019
  • October 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2016
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions